First I would like to start, I am no stranger to micronational ideological imperialism. Regretfully, I did it during the reign of the Natlandist State of the ComradeMr Republic. Because of it, Natlandism ended. I might still support it today. However, we can talk about it at another time.
I and my nation have also been the victim of ideological imperialism, the Glisean Empire waged “war” on us for being communist and having Martian and Antarctic claims. Also, during the Zealandian elections I was attacked along with the great Zealandian socialist government as, these are not exact, Anthony’s servant, bureaucrat and even some attacks on me as a person.
Now a ticking time bomb has just burst, which was actually delayed for a while seeing how it start in late November with people hotting debating over the Zealandian election that was coming up. It was to be an internal matter until imperialists that had nothing to do with Zealandia decided to defend the NPP and call Zealandia a dictatorship. This stopped any progress from being made.
Of course, even that wouldn’t start an ideological conflict all by itself. On top, Comrade Jonathan was attacked when he created Theodorism, which Daniel Anderson of Sirocco disagreed with (here is his article if you want to read it). Since Zealandia attacked this ridiculous article, the St.Charlian Observer decided to make an article saying why Zealandia was ridiculous. With many facilities I may add.
Before I get to this ridiculousness, I would like to quote Crown Prince Jonathan, “It’s articles like these which enflame such debates even more.” The article was the reason we decided to make this article, because socialism was under attack and we can’t sit by as we are a socialist nation. He also said “[C]apitalism adovocates profit, profit, and profit, with alleviating poverty a secondary concern.” That can debunk most of the article.
Sôgmô William Sörgel wrote an article explaining both the conflict and capitalism itself. It was great and I couldn’t have made a better article myself (we were publishing this to explain Burkland’s view by the way). What I want to focus on is his sentence saying:
Socialist politics and policies have meant the demise of the rich, yes, but it has meant the support of the poor and, therefore, the majority of all peoples.
Now see the capitalist say on the matter (The St.Charlian Observer):
Class is not listed in the official UN definition [of genocide] because the USSR vetoed its inclusion (no prizes for guessing why).
Guess what, in addition to being supported by the people, they have a reason! Capitalism is like feudalism but economic not political. Capitalism has done nothing to help poor people, in socialism one of the most important government jobs is to have equality and prosperity as opposed to serving an elite that doesn’t do much to really earn their status. Without an elite, there is no capitalism.
Now we should go back to the conflict itself. We think that capitalists should not push their ideology on us. We respect you if you respect us.
In unrelated news, Matthew Burklandssen expressed fears that Burklandi territory will be attacked as tensions in his family increase.